Journal of Studies in Management, Psychology & Educational Sciences

Journal of Studies in Management, Psychology & Educational Sciences

The role of influencer attributes on the purchase intention of customers

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Faculty member, Kavian Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran
2 Bachelor of business administration, Kavian Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran.
3 Master of Management, Kavian Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract
Social media influencer marketing has recently attracted a lot of attention. Many studies have investigated the formation of one-way relationship (PSR) between influencers and followers. Despite the large number of studies in the field of PSR, PSR has often been neglected compared to other widely used relationship marketing components. Based on the persuasion theory, this study has compiled a research model that was created to investigate the relative importance of PSR. This study considers 3 personal characteristics (attitude homogeneity, physical attractiveness, and social attractiveness) and three attributes (trustworthiness, perceived expertise, and PSR) as antecedents of purchase intention. The data was collected through a survey of respondents who purchase products and services by watching advertisements placed by influencers on YouTube.The study showed that PSR, compared to other characteristics, has a significant effect on purchase intentions and that PSR is related to three individual characteristics.In addition, the formation of PSR is influenced by the type of influencer perceived by customers. This survey showed that social media influencer marketing strategies should be adjusted based on individual characteristics, traits and type of influencer. This article discusses the theoretical and practical applications of these findings.As user-generated content has increased in social media, users can become pioneer producers by actively producing and uploading personal stories and product and service reviews.
Keywords

  1. Abidin, C., 2016. Visibility labour: engaging with influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media Int. Aust. 161 (1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X16665177.

    Agrawal, J., Kamakura, W.A., 1995. The economic worth of celebrity endorsers: an event study analysis. J. Mark. 59 (3), 5662.

    Ajina, A.S., 2019. The perceived value of social media marketing: an empirical study of online word-of-mouth in Saudi Arabian context. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 6 (3), 15121527.

    Al-Emadi, F.A., Yahia, I.B., 2020. Ordinary celebrities related criteria to harvest fame and influence on social media. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 14 (2), 195–213. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/JRIM-02-2018-0031.

    Alperstein, N.M., 1991. Imaginary social relationships with celebrities appearing in television commercials. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 35 (1), 4358.

    Arora, A., Bansal, S., Kandpal, C., Aswani, R., Dwivedi, Y., 2019. Measuring social media influencer index-insights from Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 49, 86101.

    Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., Guidry Moulard, J., 2020. Authenticity under threat: when social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. J. Bus. Res. 117, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008.

    1. Augustine, 2019. 1/5th of American consumers have made a purchase based on an influencer. Retrieved September 9, 2021, from https://civicscience.com/1-5th-of- american-consumers-have-made-a-purchase-based-on-an-influencer/.

     

    Auter, P.J., 1992. Psychometric: TV that talks back: An experimental validation of a parasocial interaction scale. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 36 (2), 173181.

    Bacev-Giles, C., Haji, R., 2017. Online first impressions: person perception in social media profiles. Comput. Hum. Behav. 75, 5057.

    Batra, R., Ahuvia, A., Bagozzi, R.P., 2012. Brand love. J. Mark. 76 (2), 116.

    Belanche, D., Flavian, M., I´ ba´nez-˜ Sanchez, S., 2020. Follower´ s reactions to influencers Instagram posts. Span. J. Mark. ESIC 24 (1), 3754.

    1. Berscheid, E. Walster, 1974. Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 7, pp.158-215). New York: Academic Press.

    Boerman, S.C., 2020. The effects of the standardized instagram disclosure for micro-and meso-influencers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 103, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2019.09.015.

    Brislin, R.W., 1970. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J. cross Cult. Psychol. 1 (3), 185216.

    Byrne, D., 1961. Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 62 (3), 713.

    Carroll, B.A., Ahuvia, A.C., 2006. Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Mark. lett. 17 (2), 7989.

    Casalo, L.V., Flavi´ an, C., Ib´ a´nez-S˜ anchez, S., 2017. Antecedents of consumer intention to ´ follow and recommend an instagram account. Online Inf. Rev. 41 (7), 1046–1063. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-09-2016-0253.

    Chapple, C., Cownie, F., 2017. An investigation into viewers trust in and response towards disclosed paid-for-endorsements by YouTube lifestyle vloggers. J. Promot. Commun. 5 (2), 110136.

    Chiu, C.M., Huang, H.Y., 2015. Examining the antecedents of user gratification and its effects on individuals social network services usage: the moderating role of habit. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 24 (4), 411430.

    Chu, S.C., 2011. Viral advertising in social media: Participation in Facebook groups and responses among college-aged users. J. Interact. Advert. 12 (1), 3043.

    Chung, S., Cho, H., 2017. Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychol. Mark. 34 (4), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21001.

     

    de B´erail, P., Guillon, M., Bungener, C., 2019. The relations between YouTube addiction, social anxiety and parasocial relationships with YouTubers: a moderated-mediation model based on a cognitive-behavioral framework. Comput. Hum. Behav. 99, 190204.

    De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., Hudders, L., 2017. Marketing through Instagram influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. Int. J. Advert. 36 (5), 798828.

    Dibble, J.L., Hartmann, T., Rosaen, S.F., 2016. Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Hum. Commun. Res. 42 (1), 2144.

    Djafarova, E., Rushworth, C., 2017. Exploring the credibility of online celebrities Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Comput. Hum. Behav. 68, 17.

    Dotson, M.J., Hyatt, E.M., 2000. Religious symbols as peripheral cues in advertising: a replication of the elaboration likelihood model. J. Bus. Res. 48 (1), 6368.

    Duran, R.L., Kelly, L., 1988. The influence of communicative competence on perceived task, social, and physical attraction. Commun. Q. 36 (1), 4149.

    Dwivedi, Y.K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D.L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A.S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M.M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P.A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G.A., Wang, Y., 2021. Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: perspectives and research propositions. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 59, 102168 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijinfomgt.2020.102168.

    Erdogan, B.Z., 1999. Celebrity endorsement: a literature review. J. Mark. Manag. 15 (4), 291314.

    Erkan, I., Evans, C., 2016. The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers purchase intentions: an extended approach to information adoption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 61, 4755.

    Ert, E., Fleischer, A., 2020. What do Airbnb hosts reveal by posting photographs online and how does it affect their perceived trustworthiness? Psychol. Mark. 37 (5), 630–640. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21297.

     

    Farivar, S., Wang, F., Yuan, Y., 2021. Opinion leadership vs. para-social relationship: key factors in influencer marketing. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 59, 102371 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102371.

     

    Felix, R., Rauschnabel, P.A., Hinsch, C., 2017. Elements of strategic social media marketing: a holistic framework. J. Bus. Res. 70, 118126.

    Ferchaud, A., Grzeslo, J., Orme, S., LaGroue, J., 2018. Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: exploring content trends across the most subscribed YouTube channels. Comput. Hum. Behav. 80, 8896.

    Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., Freberg, L.A., 2011. Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relat. Rev. 37 (1), 9092.

    Fu, S., Xu, Y., Yan, Q., 2019. Enhancing the parasocial interaction relationship between consumers through similarity effects in the context of social commerce. J. Strateg. Mark. 27 (2), 100118.

    Geisser, S., 1974. A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika 61 (1), 101107.

    Gonzales, M.H., Davis, J.M., Loney, G.L., LuKens, C.K., Junghans, C.M., 1983. Interactional approach to interpersonal attraction. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 44 (6), 1192–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1192.

    Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., 2016. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.

    Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., 2019. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31 (1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11- 2018-0203.

    Harrigan, P., Daly, T.M., Coussement, K., Lee, J.A., Soutar, G.N., Evers, U., 2021. Identifying influencers on social media. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 56, 102246 https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102246.

     

    Hayes, J.L., King, K.W., 2014. The social exchange of viral ads: referral and coreferral of ads among college students. J. Interact. Advert. 14 (2), 98109.

    Holroyd, C., 2019. Digital content promotion in Japan and South Korea: government strategies for an emerging economic sector. Asia Pac. Policy Stud. 6 (3), 290307.

    Horton, D., Wohl, R.R, 1956. Mass communication and para-social interaction: observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry 19 (3), 215229.

    Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., Kelley, H.H., 1953. Communication and Persuasion. Yale University Press.

    Hovland, C.I., Weiss, W., 1951. The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opin. Q. 15 (4), 635–650. Retrieved September 9, 2021, from. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2745952.

     

    Hu, L., Min, Q., Han, S., Liu, Z., 2020. Understanding followers’ stickiness to digital influencers: the effect of psychological responses. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 54, 102169 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102169.

     

    Hwang, K., Zhang, Q., 2018. Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge. Comput. Hum. Behav. 87, 155173.

    Jim´enez-Castillo, D., Sanchez-Fer´ nandez, R., 2019. The role of digital influencers in´     brand recommendation: examining their impact on engagement, expected value and purchase intention. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 49, 366376.

    Jin, S.A.A., Phua, J., 2014. Following celebrities’ tweets about brands: the impact of twitter-based electronic word-of-mouth on consumers’ source credibility perception, buying intention, and social identification with celebrities. J. Advert. 43 (2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.827606.

    Joseph, W.B., 1982. The credibility of physically attractive communicators: a review. J. Advert. 11 (3), 1524.

    Kannan, P.K., Li, H.A., 2017. Digital marketing: a framework, review and research agenda. Int. J. Res. Mark. 34 (1), 2245.

    Kapoor, K.K., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N.P., Patil, P., Dwivedi, Y.K., Nerur, S., 2018. Advances in social media research: past, present and future. Inf. Syst. Front. 20 (3), 531558.

    Kelman, H.C., 1958. Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. J. Confl. Resolut. 2 (1), 5160.

    Khamis, S., Ang, L., Welling, R., 2017. Self-branding,‘micro-celebrityand the rise of social media influencers. Celebr. Stud. 8 (2), 191208.

    Ki, C.W.C., Kim, Y.K., 2019. The mechanism by which social media influencers persuade consumers: the role of consumers’ desire to mimic. Psychol. Mark. 36 (10), 905–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21244.

    Kim, H., Ko, E., Kim, J., 2015. SNS users’ para-social relationships with celebrities: social media effects on purchase intentions. J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. 25 (3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2015.1043690.

    Kim, J., Song, H., 2016. Celebritys self-disclosure on Twitter and parasocial relationships: a mediating role of social presence. Comput. Hum. Behav. 62, 570577.

    Ladhari, R., Massa, E., Skandrani, H., 2020. YouTube vloggers’ popularity and influence: the roles of homophily, emotional attachment, and expertise. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 54, 102027 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102027.

    Lee, E.-J., 2010. The more humanlike, the better? How speech type and users’ cognitive style affect social responses to computers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26 (4), 665–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.003.

    Lee, J.E., Watkins, B., 2016. YouTube vloggers influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions. J. Bus. Res. 69 (12), 57535760.

    Li, F., Du, T.C., 2011. Who is talking? An ontology-based opinion leader identification framework for word-of-mouth marketing in online social blogs. Decis. Support Syst. 51 (1), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.007.

    Lim, X.J., Radzol, A.M., Cheah, J., Wong, M., 2017. The impact of social media influencers on purchase intention and the mediation effect of customer attitude. Asian J. Bus. Res. 7 (2), 1936.

    Lou, C., Kim, H.K., 2019. Fancying the new rich and famous? Explicating the roles of influencer content, credibility, and parental mediation in adolescents’ parasocial relationship, materialism, and purchase intentions. Front. Psychol. 10, 2567. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02567.

     

    Lou, C., Yuan, S., 2019. Influencer marketing: how message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. J. Interact. Advert. 19 (1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501.

     

    McCormick, K., 2016. Celebrity endorsements: Influence of a product-endorser match on Millennials attitudes and purchase intentions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 32, 3945.

    McCroskey, J.C., Teven, J.J., 1999. Goodwill: a reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Commun. Monogr. 66 (1), 90103.

    McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M., 2001. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27 (1), 415444.

    Mosler, H.-J., 2006. Better be convincing or better be stylish? a theory based multi-agent simulation to explain minority influence in groups via arguments or via peripheral cues. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 9 (3). Retrieved September 9, 2021, from. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/3/4.html.

    Munnukka, J., Maity, D., Reinikainen, H., Luoma-aho, V., 2019. Thanks for watching. The effectiveness of YouTube vlogendorsements. Comput. Hum. Behav. 93, 226234.

    Naylor, R.W., Lamberton, C.P., West, P.M., 2012. Beyond the "Like" button: the impact of mere virtual presence on brand evaluations and purchase intentions in social media settings. J. Mark. 76 (6), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0105.

    Ozanne, M., Liu, S.Q., Mattila, A.S., 2019. Are attractive reviewers more persuasive? Examining the role of physical attractiveness in online reviews. J. Consum. Mark. 36 (6), 728–739. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-02-2017-2096.

    Palmer, C.L., Peterson, R.D., 2016. Halo effects and the attractiveness premium in perceptions of political expertise. Am. Polit. Res. 44 (2), 353–382. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1532673X15600517.

     

    Parsons, T., 1963. On the concept of influence. Public Opin. Q. 27 (1), 3762.

    Patzer, G.L., 1983. Source credibility as a function of communicator physical attractiveness. J. Bus. Res. 11 (2), 229241.

    Pentina, I., Zhang, L., Basmanova, O., 2013. Antecedents and consequences of trust in a social media brand: a cross-cultural study of Twitter. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29 (4), 15461555.

    Petty, R.E., 2013. Two routes to persuasion: State of the art. Int. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2 (1), 229247.

    Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., 1981. Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. William C Brown Company Publishers, Dubuque, Iowa. 

    R.E. Petty, J.T. Cacioppo, 1986. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.

    Powell, L., Richmond, V.P., Cantrell-Williams, G., 2012. The "Drinking-Buddy" scale as a measure of para-social behavior. Psychol. Rep. 110 (3), 1029–1037. https://doi.org/ 10.2466/07.17.28.PR0.110.3.1029-1037.

    Rauschnabel, P.A., 2021. Augmented reality is eating the real-world! the substitution of physical products by holograms.  Int. J. Inf. Manag. 57, 102279 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102279.

    Reichelt, J., Sievert, J., Jacob, F., 2014. How credibility affects eWOM reading: the influences of expertise, trustworthiness, and similarity on utilitarian and social functions. J. Mark. Commun. 20 (1-2), 6581.

    Rogers, E.M., Bhowmik, D.K., 1970. Homophily-heterophily: relational concepts for communication research. Public Opin. Q. 34 (4), 523538.

    Rubin, A.M., Perse, E.M., 1987. Audience activity and soap opera involvement a uses and effects investigation. Hum. Commun. Res. 14 (2), 246268.

    Rubin, A.M., Step, M.M., 2000. Impact of motoivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 44 (4), 635654.

    Sanz-Blas, S., Buzova, D., P´erez-Ruiz, P., 2021. Building relational worth in an online social community through virtual structural embeddedness and relational embeddedness. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 162, 120350 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120350.

     

    Schmid, H., Klimmt, C., 2011. A magically nice guy: parasocial relationships with Harry Potter across different cultures. Int. Commun. Gaz. 73 (3), 252–269. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1748048510393658.

    Schomer, A. 2019. Influencer marketing: state of the social media influencer market in 2020. Retrieved September 9, 2021, from https://www.businessinsider.com/i nfluencer-marketing report.

     

    Schouten, A.P., Janssen, L., Verspaget, M., 2020. Celebrity vs. influencer endorsements in advertising: the role of identification, credibility, and product-endorser fit. Int. J. Advert. 39 (2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898.

    Schultz, D.E., Peltier, J., 2013. Social media’s slippery slope: challenges, opportunities and future research directions. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 7 (2), 86–99. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/JRIM-12-2012-0054.

    Schwemmer, C., Ziewiecki, S., 2018. Social media sellout: the increasing role of product promotion on YouTube. Soc. Media + Soc. 4 (3) https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2056305118786720, 2056305118786720. 

    Shan, Y., Chen, K.J., Lin, J.S., 2019. When social media influencers endorse brands: the effects of self-influencer congruence, parasocial identification, and perceived endorser motive. International Journal of Advertising 39 (5), 590610.

    Shareef, M.A., Mukerji, B., Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P., Islam, R., 2019. Social media marketing: comparative effect of advertisement sources. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 46, 5869.

    Shareef, M.A., Kapoor, K.K., Mukerji, B., Dwivedi, R., Dwivedi, Y.K., 2020. Group behavior in social media: antecedents of initial trust formation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 105, 106225 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106225.

    Shen, A.X., Lee, M.K., Cheung, C.M., Chen, H., 2010. Gender differences in intentional social action: we-intention to engage in social network-facilitated team collaboration. J. Inf. Technol. 25 (2), 152169.

    Sokolova, K., Kefi, H., 2020. Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 53 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011.

     

    Stephens, D.L., Hill, R.P., Bergman, K., 1996. Enhancing the consumer-product relationship: lessons from the QVC home shopping channel. J. Bus. Res. 37 (3), 193200.

    Sternthal, B., Dholakia, R., Leavitt, C., 1978. The persuasive effect of source credibility: tests of cognitive response. J. Consum. Res. 4 (4), 252–260. https://doi.org/ 10.1086/208704.

    Stone, M., 1977. An asymptotic equivalence of choice of model by cross-validation and Akaikes criterion. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 39 (1), 4447 (Methodological)

    Till, B.D., Busler, M., 2000. The match-up hypothesis: physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. J. Advert. 29 (3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673613.

    Toma, C.L., 2014. Counting on friends: cues to perceived trustworthiness in Facebook profiles. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2014

    Wang, S.W., Scheinbaum, A.C., 2018. Enhancing brand credibility via celebrity endorsement: Trustworthiness trumps attractiveness and expertise. J. Advert. Res. 58 (1), 1632.

    Wang, Z., Walther, J.B., Pingree, S., Hawkins, R.P., 2008. Health information, credibility, homophily, and influence via the internet: web sites versus discussion groups. Health Commun. 23 (4), 358368.

    Woodroof, P.J., Howie, K.M., Syrdal, H.A., VanMeter, R., 2020. What’s done in the dark will be brought to the light: effects of influencer transparency on product efficacy and purchase intentions. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 29 (5), 675–688. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/jpbm-05-2019-2362.

    Yuan, C.L., Kim, J., Kim, S.J., 2016. Parasocial relationship effects on customer equity in the social media context. J. Bus. Res. 69 (9), 3795–3803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2015.12.071.

    1. Zhou, L. Barnes, H. McCormick, M. Blazquez Cano, 2020. Social media influencers’ narrative strategies to create eWOM: a theoretical contribution. Int. J. Inf. Manag., 102293. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102293.